GREEN ARROWLLM v2 (edge)
PAPER · NO LIVE AUTH REGIME / RISK_ON
LIVE · 17:13:02 ET · refresh 15s
AUTO-CYCLE / 15MPAPER-LOCKED
EQUITY
$1,047.51
+$12.20 P/Lsince inception
TOTAL RETURN
+1.18%
LAST CYCLE
+0.01%
0 open · regime risk_on
DAY-TRADES / 5D
0 / 3
EQUITY CURVE
1D1W1MALL
05:4315:1513:0010:3017:00
RISK POSTURE
DEPLOYED66%
$689.56 at work$357.95 dry powder
MAX DD
-1.1%
FILLS
0
BLOCKED
0
OPEN
0
WIN RATE
—
AVG HOLD
—
Cash account, no leverage — can't lose more than deposited. Regime risk_on: entries sized to at most 25% per position and 2% risk per trade.
OPEN POSITIONS0 OPEN / 5 CAP
SYMBOLCLASSENTRYSTOP / ENTRY / TARGETR:RSCALED
Flat. No open positions.
RECENT ORDERS
TIMESTATUSSIDE / SYMBOLQTYFILL
Sep 30, 10:45:35 PENDING BUY AMD 0.0517 —
Sep 29, 13:30:40 PENDING SELL TSLA 0.1414 —
Sep 29, 09:30:44 PENDING BUY META 0.0866 —
ACTIVITY & DECISIONS

Every proposal, why it was allowed or blocked, and what filled.

LLM STANCEOct 5, 17:00:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 16:45:06
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 16:30:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 16:15:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 16:00:11
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 15:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 15:30:13
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 15:15:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 15:00:15
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 14:45:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 14:30:14
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 14:15:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 14:00:17
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 13:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 13:30:13
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 13:15:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 13:00:15
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 12:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 12:30:21
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 12:15:13
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 12:00:19
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 11:45:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 11:30:15
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 11:15:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 11:00:17
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 10:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 10:30:18
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 10:15:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 10:00:16
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 09:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 09:30:14
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 09:15:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 5, 09:00:24
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 17:45:07
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 17:30:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 17:15:07
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 17:00:12
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 16:45:07
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 16:30:11
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 16:15:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 16:00:17
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 15:45:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 15:30:14
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 15:15:10
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 15:00:16
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 14:45:07
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 14:30:11
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 14:15:07
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 14:00:18
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 13:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 13:30:14
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 13:15:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 13:00:16
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 12:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 12:30:11
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 12:15:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 12:00:15
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 11:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 11:30:11
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 11:15:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 11:00:17
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 10:45:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 10:30:12
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 10:15:09
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 10:00:16
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 09:45:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 09:30:15
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 09:15:08
stance
LLM STANCEOct 2, 09:00:24
stance
LLM STANCEOct 1, 18:02:22
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — Mandate requires beating SPY by 5pp on 30d while holding smaller drawdown. 74% invested with the overweight in relative-strength tech leaders gives enough beta tilt to outperform a flat-to-grinding SPY, while 26% cash cushions any index drawdown so ours stays shallower than the benchmark's. Prior stances targeted 74% but actual invested sits at 65%, so this closes the gap rather than adding new risk.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 17:45:31
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — Portfolio is ~65% invested vs. my standing 74-75% target. To beat SPY by 5pts on a rolling 30d window I need overweight exposure to the leading relative-strength names (MSFT, NVDA, QQQ) rather than cash drag, but the neutral SPY tape and elevated-yield backdrop argue against going fully invested — keeping ~26% cash buffers drawdown vs. SPY, satisfying the protect side of the mandate. I add modestly to the two cleanest trends (MSFT, NVDA) rather than chasing extended AMD or catching the META knife. All positions remain well under the 30% single-name cap; diversification across 8 names keeps any single-name shock contained.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 17:30:38
risk 3/5 · target invested 75% — To beat SPY by 5pts on a rolling 30d window I need concentrated exposure to the leadership cohort (QQQ/MSFT/NVDA) that is outpacing the flat benchmark. But the protect condition demands a smaller drawdown than SPY, so I cap invested at ~75%, spread adds across three names rather than one, and skip overextended AMD. The 25% cash buffer plus diversification across 8 holdings keeps max single-name risk well under the 30% limit and cushions any yield-driven pullback.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 17:15:35
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pts I need concentrated exposure to the outperforming tech complex, not benchmark-hugging. But drawdown must stay smaller than SPY's, so I keep ~26% cash, avoid adding to extended names (AMD RSI 74, crypto RSI 76+), and size adds into the steadier momentum names (MSFT, NVDA, QQQ). Portfolio sits at 65% invested vs 74% target; completing the planned adds. No single position near the 30% cap; largest is GOOGL/MSFT/QQQ at ~12% each.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 17:00:44
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pts I need the tech overweight working, and it is (NVDA +8.5%, MSFT +3.5%, QQQ/GOOGL green). I'm at ~65% invested vs my 74% target, so I add ~9% equity split between the two cleanest momentum names (MSFT, NVDA) plus a small QQQ top-up. Keeping ~26% cash and avoiding extended names (AMD, META, crypto) protects the drawdown condition — no single position exceeds ~16%, no options risk, no earnings blackouts flagged.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 16:45:35
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pp I need an overweight in the names actually leading (MSFT, NVDA, QQQ) rather than benchmark-hugging. To keep drawdown smaller than SPY, I hold ~26% cash as a buffer, avoid extended names (AMD RSI 74, BTC/ETH RSI 76+), and don't add to names with fresh negative catalysts (GOOGL $3.2B damages ruling, META sharp 5d pullback). Actual deployment (65%) is below my stated 74% target from recent cycles, so I deploy ~$82 into the two strongest leaders with reasonable entry points. No earnings blackouts flagged.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 16:30:40
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pts I need concentrated exposure to the tech leadership that is outpacing the index, but to keep drawdown smaller than SPY I hold ~26% cash as a shock absorber given yield pressure. Adding modestly to MSFT and NVDA (strongest momentum, not yet overbought) plus a QQQ increment moves me from 65% to ~74% invested without chasing stretched names (AMD RSI 74) or knife-catching META/TSLA 5d breakdowns. No position exceeds the 30% cap; largest will be ~16% MSFT.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 16:15:38
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pts I need concentrated exposure to what's outperforming (QQQ/MSFT/NVDA complex), but to keep drawdown smaller than SPY I cap invested at ~74% and avoid extended names (AMD RSI 74, crypto RSI 77) and falling knives (TSLA). Current book is only 65% invested — topping up the two strongest trends closes the gap to target without adding fragile positions. Diversification across 8 names with no position >13% keeps single-name drawdown risk contained.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 16:00:45
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pp I need concentrated exposure to the leadership cohort (QQQ/MSFT/NVDA) rather than benchmark-hugging; to protect drawdown vs SPY in a high-yield regime I cap invested at ~74%, keeping ~26% cash buffer and avoiding overbought/extended names. Topping up to target with small adds to the three strongest-momentum holdings, holding everything else. No position exceeds ~15% of equity, well under the 30% cap.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 15:45:39
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — To beat SPY by 5pts I need a tilt toward what's outperforming (QQQ/MSFT/NVDA rel strength), but to keep drawdown smaller than SPY I cap invested at ~74% and avoid extended names (AMD RSI 74, crypto RSI 76+). Current invested ~65% is below target, so I add modestly to the confirmed leaders. ~26% cash cushions any yield-driven selloff and keeps portfolio beta below 1 vs SPY.
LLM STANCEOct 1, 15:30:43
risk 3/5 · target invested 74% — Book sits at ~65% invested vs the 74% target I've held in recent cycles; closing the gap via the two strongest relative-strength names rather than adding to laggards or overbought AMD. 74% invested with concentration in leading mega-caps gives enough beta+alpha to beat SPY by 5pts if leadership persists, while ~26% cash and a max single-position weight of ~16% keeps my drawdown profile shallower than SPY's — satisfying both the beat and protect legs of the mandate. No new positions into extended RSI (AMD 74, BTC/ETH 76) and no fresh theses, consistent with avoiding churn flagged in my history.
GREEN ARROW LLM V2 (EDGE)PAPER TRADING510 JOURNAL EVENTS